Randall Levine: Prosecutors in Flint Water Crisis criminal investigation have no basis for appeal

Randall Levine

After prosecutors announced their plan to appeal Circuit Court Judge Elizabeth Kelly’s decision to dismiss charges in the Flint Water Crisis criminal investigation, Criminal Defense Attorney Randall Levine, who represents former Gov. Rick Snyder aide Rich Baird, said there is no basis for their appeal.

“I understand that the government has announced that it intends to appeal Judge Kelly’s order dismissing the charges against Rich Baird,” Levine told media outlets on Tuesday, Oct. 25, including: Detroit Free Press, The Detroit News, Michigan Public Radio, Law 360, WVPE Radio in Indiana, WEYI TV in Flint, and WLNS TV in Lansing. “There simply is no basis for an appeal.

“The Michigan Supreme Court was very clear about its ruling in this case. The government’s effort to dust off an archaic statute and proceed against Rich Baird in secrecy was resoundingly condemned by the high court. The government deliberately chose to utilize a one-person grand jury in order to circumvent Mr. Baird’s right to a preliminary examination and an opportunity to challenge the evidence which the government claims it has against him in open court.

“The Michigan Supreme Court found that the one-person grand juror did not have any authority to indict Mr. Baird and therefore the Indictment issued is null and void,” said Levine. “To suggest now that an appellate court can somehow waive its magic wand and revitalize an indictment found by the Michigan Supreme Court to have been invalid borders on the absurd.”

Earlier this month, Judge Kelly dismissed felony charges against Baird and six others charged in the case, including former MDHHS director Nick Lyon, former State Chief Medical Executive Eden Wells, former Flint emergency managers Darnell Early and Gerald Ambrose. Kelly’s decision followed a ruling by the Michigan Supreme Court that the one-person grand jury prosecutors used to secure indictments was flawed.

On Tuesday, Oct. 25, the Michigan Attorney General’s office issued a statement from the prosecutors, stating they plan to appeal Judge Kelly’s ruling from earlier this month:

“The court proceedings up to this point have been a challenge to the process, not the merits of the case. The public deserves to hear the evidence against these defendants. Remanding these cases for preliminary exam is the next logical step in the legal process based on the ruling from the Michigan Supreme Court.

"The Michigan Supreme Court did not abolish the one-person grand jury, but instead more specifically defined the process, leaving a path for the prosecution to pursue charges against the defendants. The prosecution followed the law in using the one-person grand jury process from the beginning and is prepared to move forward on the valid warrants issued in these cases in compliance with the new process defined in the opinion from the Court."

In the Media:

Related Posts
  • Real Estate Attorney Sharan Levine shares details about changes coming to Michigan’s Marketable Record Title Act on March 29 Read More
  • Sarissa Montague: James and Jennifer Crumbley convictions set legal precedent in Michigan Read More
  • MLive/The Muskegon Chronicle reaches out to Randall Levine for expertise in assessing intellectual disability relating to criminal matters Read More